<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing the Aurora 88 and Mont Blanc&#8217;s 146</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/</link>
	<description>what I&#039;m into right now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gav</title>
		<link>http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannzeman.com/?p=1001#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>A good, useful comparison.  I love my Aurora 88 piston filler although I do wonder what they were thinking every time I look at that scroll work on the nib.  When compared against the MB 4810 or Pelikan Souveran nibs, lets face it, it&#039;s pretty ugly!  That said, it writes magnificently although my 14k Medium is very toothy albeit nice and fine when used in reverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good, useful comparison.  I love my Aurora 88 piston filler although I do wonder what they were thinking every time I look at that scroll work on the nib.  When compared against the MB 4810 or Pelikan Souveran nibs, lets face it, it&#8217;s pretty ugly!  That said, it writes magnificently although my 14k Medium is very toothy albeit nice and fine when used in reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannzeman.com/?p=1001#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Eric,

I think you&#039;re probably right about including a cost comparison, in which case the Aurora would probably win, although I can&#039;t say for sure. The only reason I didn&#039;t include the prices was because I don&#039;t buy pens at retail. I only buy them used and they&#039;re both similarly priced in that market, at least for the gold trim versions. 

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re probably right about including a cost comparison, in which case the Aurora would probably win, although I can&#8217;t say for sure. The only reason I didn&#8217;t include the prices was because I don&#8217;t buy pens at retail. I only buy them used and they&#8217;re both similarly priced in that market, at least for the gold trim versions. </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannzeman.com/?p=1001#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly about the cursive &quot;Aurora&quot; on the cap band. It just doesn&#039;t look right to me. That&#039;s why I opted for the chrome cap, which comes with &quot;AURORA&quot; in nice block letters.

I also agree that the MB nib is much better looking than Aurora&#039;s. Then again, any two-tone nib is going to catch my eye over a mono-tone. I suspect that the larger and simpler scroll work on the Aurora nib was a cost saving decision.

And speaking of cost... shouldn&#039;t a head-to-head comparison like this include each pen&#039;s MSRP? I honestly don&#039;t know the cost of new 146, but I&#039;m confident that the A88 would come out the winner of the price category.

=) Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly about the cursive &#8220;Aurora&#8221; on the cap band. It just doesn&#8217;t look right to me. That&#8217;s why I opted for the chrome cap, which comes with &#8220;AURORA&#8221; in nice block letters.</p>
<p>I also agree that the MB nib is much better looking than Aurora&#8217;s. Then again, any two-tone nib is going to catch my eye over a mono-tone. I suspect that the larger and simpler scroll work on the Aurora nib was a cost saving decision.</p>
<p>And speaking of cost&#8230; shouldn&#8217;t a head-to-head comparison like this include each pen&#8217;s MSRP? I honestly don&#8217;t know the cost of new 146, but I&#8217;m confident that the A88 would come out the winner of the price category.</p>
<p>=) Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.dannzeman.com/2010/01/20/comparing-the-aurora-88-and-mont-blancs-146/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannzeman.com/?p=1001#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed your comments. Absolutely agree. Love my Aurora 88 and Montblanc 146 but the 146 is definitely superior and my favorite writer. I also love it&#039;s elegance. 146 will always be a winner in my books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your comments. Absolutely agree. Love my Aurora 88 and Montblanc 146 but the 146 is definitely superior and my favorite writer. I also love it&#8217;s elegance. 146 will always be a winner in my books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
